Showing posts with label Joseph Gordon-Levitt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joseph Gordon-Levitt. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

LINCOLN

There is exactly one battle sequence of consequence in Steven Spielberg's Civil War drama Lincoln, and it comes right at the beginning. The short, ugly scene features soldiers fighting in the rain, waist deep in mud, using rifles, bayonets, and bare knuckles. The battle is somewhat futile because, as the film reminds us, by the fall of 1864 the Civil War was basically over, but the battles went on regardless.

Today we generally accept that the end of the Civil War would naturally involve the end of slavery but, as the film documents, it wasn't always certain. President Lincoln (Daniel Day-Lewis) want's to pass a constitutional amendment outlawing slavery but faces an uphill slog. His own party isn't enthusiastic about it, and the opposing Democrats are dead set against it. But Lincoln knows that without the amendment all those endless battles would mean nothing.

On paper, the prospect of a two and half hour period film about the complications of passing legislation sounds dull as paste, but it's those colossally high stakes and the lengths that is Lincoln willing to go to that help make the film compelling. In order to get any Democratic support, he must essentially start handing out bribes. If that weren't enough of a potential scandal, Lincoln knows that if the South surrenders before the vote, it will guarantee the amendments failure and so he must find a way to delay the end of the war.

Spielberg delivers all these complex plot points with the help of a very sharp script by Tony Kushner (who won the Pulitzer for Angels in America), partially based on Doris Kearns Goodwin's book Team of Rivals, which delivers line after line of crackling dialogue. Many of the best lines are spoken by Tommy Lee Jones as Republican firebrand Thaddeus Stevens who has some of the best flippant putdowns this side of The Social Network.

Ironically if there's anyone who gets a pass it's Lincoln himself. Day-Lewis is as amazing as we expect him to be, but the film keeps the character at a distance. Apart from a passionate argument with his wife (Sally Field who's every bit as good as Day-Lewis) and a series of affable, home-spun ramblings, there's precious little insight into Lincoln the person. It's strange that showing us his thought-process and the anxiety consuming him doesn't translate into a more complete portrait of the man. This would be less of a problem if the film weren't called Lincoln. This is a film more about the moment that defined his legacy than it is about the man himself.

On the one hand, Spielberg's reluctance to deconstruct Lincoln too much is understandable, the man is the closest thing America has to a bona fide Christ figure. But there is something that just doesn't gel about watching the man talk about all the moral compromises he's had to make, order bribes, suspend habeas corpus, etc, and then slowly put on that famous hat and walk into a beam of light as John Williams's score swells. It's not that the film causes one to lose respect for the man, on the contrary, it's obvious how righteous his goals are, it's just that the film's iconography is simper than the its depiction of the man.

To call Lincoln a bio-pic is a bit disingenuous as it denotes a greater level of introspection then we get here. But what Spielberg has given us instead is equally valuable – an accurate, historical procedural documenting one of the most important moments in American history. It may try too hard for those Oscar moments at times, but on the whole the craftsmanship is strong and delivers a very entertaining film about what could have been a very dry subject.

Grade: B+

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

LOOPER

It’s 2044. Joe (Joseph Gorden-Levitt) is standing in a cornfield, looking at a pocket watch with nonsensical symbols. At the appointed time a second man appears out of thin air with a bag over his head. Joe shoots the man dead and burns his body. Joe does this sort of thing all the time. He is a looper, a specialized assassin who kills people sent back from 30 years in the future, where time travel exists and is controlled by the mob.

His life is glamorous. The money is good, there are fast cars, women and drugs. This is fortunate for Joe as it seems that 2044 has suffered an economic apocalypse. One day, Joe gets a looping assignment but the man who appears is himself from 30 years in the future (Bruce Willis). This happens sometimes, it’s known as “closing the loop.”  Upon being confronted with his future self, he hesitates just long enough to let old Joe get away and the chase is on. In another movie, Joe would wrestle with the idea of having to kill his future self, but Joe knows what happens to people who fail to close their loops. 

To reveal anything more would be unfair. Also it would take too much time. There is a lot going on in this movie. Writer-director Rian Johnson (Brick, Brothers Bloom) has created one of the most intricate sci-fi universes to come along in a long time. There's something interesting going on around every corner. It’s also admirable that he has the confidence to not explain too much. Much like Star Wars or Blade Runner, a lot of the details and ideas are left for the audience to pick up on and fill in for themselves. Personally, I was fascinated by this idea of this future society using the past as something to exploit, as a dumping ground for its problems. It was as if 2044 was the subjugated colony of 2074. The future mobsters (I love saying that), even send a viceroy named Abe (Jeff Daniels in a hilarious performance) back in time to run the looper operation and keep them in line.

Another admirable thing about this film is its willingness to let its protagonist be an asshole. Both versions of Joe do reprehensible things to survive in this film, which is fine when it's justified, but though old Joe is given a pretty reasonable out, he would rather continue on a very violent path for the most selfish of reasons. It’s fun watching a film where your allegiance to the protagonist and antagonist switches back and forth, and even more fun knowing that they’re really the same person.

Both stars do wonderful jobs in their respective roles. Between this and Moonrise Kingdom, Willis seems to be on a bit of a roll. Levitt wears some light prosthetics to make him look more like a young Bruce Willis. From the side the resemblance is uncanny, but from the front it seems like he used too much filler on his eyebrows. Who knows, maybe that’s just how the kids wear their eyebrows in 2044. Anyway Levitt is excellent, he’s picked up a lot of Willis’s mannerisms, the sarcastic apathy, the lack of eye contact with authority figures, Levitt’s got the Bruce Willis thing down.

Ever since Rian Johnson broke out with his 2005 noir masterpiece Brick, he's been positioning himself as one of our most important young writer-directors. That he chose to do a sci-fi action thriller is commendable. His intricate world building and stylization suits the genre quite well, I hope he does more stuff like this. Lord knows the genre needs more auteurs as talented like Johnson.

Grade:A-