The problem with franchise film making is that it seems to
require a certain amount of status-quo. No matter how dramatic it would be, you
can't kill Iron Man because the studio has a five picture deal. But when freed
from these restraints really interesting things can happen. As it entered
production, Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
looked like it might be the last Trek film. Certainly, the last with Leonard Nimoy who had grown tired of
his role in a franchise that frankly hadn't been serving him well. But then two
things happened. Firstly, he started to enjoy making Wrath which gave him a fantastic death scene that was the
whole thematic crux of the film, and secondly Wrath of Khan ended up making more money then expected. A third
film was now in the cards, but Spock was dead. The franchise could have moved
forward and dealt with the consequences of this major dramatic event in a
thoughtful manner, but it would also mean risk losing part of what made the
franchise profitable. The laws of status-quo demand Spock’s return.
As a result, we got Star Trek III: The Search for Spock. Talk about putting a spoiler in the title. No money
will be awarded to anyone who guesses whether or not they find him. Any film
that starts from this premise is bound to disappoint. It's not a cynical film
by any means, but it exists as a rote rebuke of everything the previous film
was about. Spock's self sacrifice
was meant to teach Kirk that he couldn’t cheat death...except now he can, kinda
sorta.
Just Kidding: The Movie starts
by rewinding back to the end of Wrath, and reminding us that just before Spock died, he mind melded with Dr.
McCoy (Deforest Kelley). After the Enterprise returns to Earth, Admiral Kirk
(William Shatner) is informed by Spock's father (the wonderful Mark Leonard) that the mind meld transferred Spock's soul into McCoy's body. If Kirk can just
bring McCoy and Spock's body to Vulcan, then Spock could be revived with an
ancient ritual. The Vulcan's have always had some psychic powers, but it's a
bit silly when they go from being studious logicians to bringing people back
from the dead with magic.
Having McCoy, all Kirk needs is Spock's body which is on the
Genesis Planet created at the end of the last film. It's far too simple a goal
for this film so we get a couple perfunctory roadblocks such as Starfleet brass
decommissioning the Enterprise and a group of Klingon's extremist's, lead by
Christopher Lloyd for some reason, who are trying to get their hands on the
Genesis Device which no longer exists.
None of this works as well as it should. Having
Leonard Nimoy direct the film may have been a good way to keep him around but it serves
the film poorly. He would go on to direct a much better Star Trek film in the future, but his direction here aims for somber but misses the mark and becomes flat and ordinary. Ultimately
he’s serving too many masters. Nimoy wants to give Spock’s death the proper
weight but is also caught up in the idea of bringing him back and too
distracted by exploring the further implications of the Genesis Device. Though
some of the blame should fall on screenwriter/producer Harve Bennett, Nimoy’s
inability to connect all these ideas coherently only exacerbates the thinness of the film.
The Genesis angle does provide the film with its best
stuff. We get Savvak (recast with Robin Curtis for money reasons) and Kirk's
son David (Merrit Butrick) exploring the Genesis planet. We learn that David
took some unethical shortcuts in creating the device that are now causing the
planet to rapidly destabilize. They also find Spock, his body reanimated by the
planet's radiation or something. Not only has his body been reanimated, he's
also been rejuvenated into a rapidly aging young boy who's consciousness is
tied to the planet. It doesn't make a lick of sense, but at least it’s
engaging.
This idea of Spock’s body being torn up by the planet mirrors the idea of McCoy's mind being overloaded by the added burden of Spock's consciousness, but neither idea really develops. The McCoy angle is particularly neglected and inconstant, basically boiling down to Kelley slipping into a spotty impression of Nimoy. It scores some laughs to be sure, but as a device, it essentially robs the film of both Spock and McCoy, making the film feeling somewhat under populated.
This idea of Spock’s body being torn up by the planet mirrors the idea of McCoy's mind being overloaded by the added burden of Spock's consciousness, but neither idea really develops. The McCoy angle is particularly neglected and inconstant, basically boiling down to Kelley slipping into a spotty impression of Nimoy. It scores some laughs to be sure, but as a device, it essentially robs the film of both Spock and McCoy, making the film feeling somewhat under populated.
But we still have Kirk and the rest of the crew who do an
admirable job filling in for some fluffy heist sequences where the crew plot to
steal the Enterprise back. These sequences play heavily on the star power of
the actors and is the first time in the franchise where all the supporting
characters have something to do (except Checkov, poor guy). With these scenes we also get some of the aging theme that's been present in the previous films. We learn that the reason that
reason the Enterprise has been decommissioned is to make room for a younger
crew on a new, experimental ship, The Excelsior. None of this ever rises above escapist fantasy about how these borderline senior citizens are willing to sacrifice their carriers to save their friend
and go on one, last adventure. It’s heartwarming but it's also tremendously
easy.
The film tries to darken itself up towards the end when
those pesky, shoehorned Klingons show up for one of those forgettable, climactic fist fights avoided by films with better sense. (Spoilers) As Kirk kicks the Klingon captain off a cliff he shouts out, in classic Shatner-esque fashion: "I have had enough of you," a sentiment which unfortunately sums up the entire scene. In the lead up, David sacrifices
himself so the franchise can avoid dealing with Kirk having a son, and in the film's most effective moment, Kirk destroys the Enterprise. Perhaps it's personal bias, but seeing serious harm done to any incarnation of the Enterprise always seems to work dramatically, it's the only "character" in this franchise that can be killed and replaced without dedicating an entire film to it. (End Spoilers)
Search for Spock is a
mixed bag of a film, but it is enjoyable. It exists primarily to retcon large
parts of what is arguably the franchises best film. It’s also wafer thin, and full
of easy, downright lazy choices, but it still holds together, largely due to
the charisma of the cast. As cynical as it looks on paper, it does have some genuine heart to it. It’s a lesser Trek, but it’s the best of the lesser Trek’s.
Grade: C+
Trekkin' It directory:
The Motion Picture
Space Seed / The Wrath of Khan
The Search for Spock
The Voyage Home
The Final Frontier
The Undiscovered Country
Generations
First Contact
Insurrection
Nemesis
Star Trek '09
Into Darkness (spoiler analysis)
The Motion Picture
Space Seed / The Wrath of Khan
The Search for Spock
The Voyage Home
The Final Frontier
The Undiscovered Country
Generations
First Contact
Insurrection
Nemesis
Star Trek '09
Into Darkness (spoiler analysis)
No comments:
Post a Comment