Monday, October 29, 2012

BONDATHON: DIE ANOTHER DAY

In 2002, the Bond franchise celebrated it's 40th anniversary with its 20th film, Die Another Day. The film isn't terribly well remembered, in fact it's considered a low point of the franchise that almost destroyed 007 forever. This hate fly's in the face of the fact that it got not terrible reviews and made a boat load of money, begging the question, is Die Another Day really that bad?

The short answer is no. The film is not good. Not good by any means, but it's hardly as unwatchable as say The Man With The Golden Gun and as much as it tries, and good Lord it does try, it's not nearly as outrageous as Moonraker.

Before descending completely into camp, we have an admirably hardcore opening where Bond (Pierce Brosnan) is captured and spends the next fourteen months being tortured in a North Korean prison camp. The torture continues through the opening credits meaning Bond's ultimate punishment is having to listen to Madonna's awful title track. Eventually Bond is traded back only to face suspicion from M (Judi Dench) over what Bond did or did not divulge during his internment. M strips Bond of his Double O status and detains him for further questioning. Backed against the wall, Bond has no choice but to break out and go rogue to clear his name.

Up till here everything is fine. The action is heightened, but not out of line with series norms. Brosnan is a bit hammy when playing dark, but generally okay. The film has adequately set the stage for a darker, more personal adventure. Unfortunately that's not what it delivers and things take a turn around the 50 minute mark as the film decides that it wants to be a goofy, sci-fi cartoon and never looks back.

On the one hand I admire separating the dark and whimsical elements of the franchise into separate segments as they have never played well together. On the other hand the series has never been good at whimsy so having the entire second half of the film be all whimsy turns out to be a pretty fatal move.

Some of it works. The ice palace fortress of super-villain/Richard Branson analogue Gustav Graves (Toby Stephens) is a tremendously silly idea, but a visually striking one none the less. Also, I liked that when the bad guys capture Bond late in the film, they figure out that they have to take his laser watch too. Also Halley Barry is fun as Bond's NSA agent sidekick Jinx. Jinx is another one of those female James Bonds from foreign agencies. She has her own gadgets, her own car, and like Bond she can only speak in groan inducing double entendres.

But then there is nearly every other element of the film. For every moment that works, there are entire sequences that fall flat. Let's start with the villain. I wanted to like Graves. He's partially based on everyone's favorite billionaire Richard Branson and partially on Ian Fleming's version of Moonraker baddie Hugo Drax, a character who certainly didn't get his due in the official adaptation and doesn't do much better here.

Take his villainy. In addition to having a derivative super weapon (another laser satellite) Graves also has a terribly unimaginative plan to (spoiler alert) destroy the mine field separating North and South Korea so that the North can invade. This brings up some important questions, 1) Why is he using a super-laser with more destructive power than an atomic bomb to clear a mine field when he can just destroy Seoul, forcing the South to surrender? 2) Are there any satellites in this universe that don't double as giant lasers, and if not, why doesn't the world just outlaw satellites? (end spoiler alert)

That laser leads to the films most infamous scene where Graves, who is controlling the weapon via a robot suit, has the laser chase Bond so that he must kite surf down a melting glacier. Until now the only reason the franchise has sort of gotten away with nutty ideas like this is that we've gotten to see talented stunt men pulling them off. This film robs us of even that pleasure by executing the scene with terrible CGI, with close-ups of Brosnan serving as the only photographic element. It's not that CGI can't produce nail-bitters (just look at the fantastic set-pieces that Pixar has done over the years), but you have to convince the audience that there is a real person in real danger. Even a wacky, cartoon universe should be able to ground it's audience somewhat.

Ultimately though, Die isn't interested in grounding us. It just piles on gimmick after shallow gimmick. DNA treatment centers, dancing lasers and the aforementioned robot suit. Heck, the most plausible element in the film is Bond's invisible car! Yeah, that invisible car that uses tiny camera's to project images onto the other side is actually, theoretically sound. Still, it doesn't matter because watching 007 slowly sneak around Graves's lair in a 4,000lb invisible Aston Martin is one of the most laughable images in the entire film.

The film's laughability isn't helped by the stylistic flourishes imposed by director Lee Tamahori (XXX: State of the Union). The man seems obsessed with step-printing and mock fast motion that hit at seemingly random moments and fly in the face of the formalism that the rest of the film is shot with and just help underline that these films had gone right back to being cartoon parodies of themselves. In a way, this is the cinematic equivalent of a mid-life crisis, artificially big, gaudy and over the top, the film keeps trying to convince us how young this franchise is and fools no one.

Grade: C-

Enjoy these other Bondathon entries:
You Only Live Twice
On Her Majesty's Secret Service 
Diamonds Are Forever
Live and Let Die
The Man With The Golden Gun 
The Spy Who Loved Me 
Moonraker
For Your Eyes Only
Octopussy  
A View To A Kill
The Living Daylights
Licence To Kill
Goldeneye
Tomorrow Never Dies
The World is Not Enough
Die Another Day
Casino Royale
Quantum of Solace
Skyfall

 

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

BONDATHON: THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH

There is a moment in The World is Not Enough, Pierce Brosnan's third outing as venerable superspy 007, where he stumbles onto a nuclear facility. As he takes the elevator down into one of Peter Lamont's huge sets, I figured that this must be the villains lair meaning we were entering the films last act. I then glanced down at the counter on my DVD player and realized with mounting dread that I wasn't even halfway through the film yet.

Let's go back to the beginning. It's customary for these films to have a pre-credit action sequence to help introduce the plot and maybe remind us of how cool Bond is with a spectacular stunt. This one has nice stunts, but damned if I know what was happening in it. Bond is trying to get some money back for reasons never really made clear, it all goes wrong, MI6 headquarters gets blown up and Bond ends up chasing a sniper down the Thames in a rocket boat he borrowed from Batman.

These prologues are often the best part of the film (even Moonraker had a decent one), but this one makes the pivotal mistake of not playing like a prologue, but like a sequence from the middle of a film. It's not just in that it starts out at such a high level of action that the film has to go to Toon Town to top it (we'll get to that), but that it's paced in a way that sub-consciously tricked my brain into thinking it was much later in the film. That said I do like the touch of having it end with Bond falling from a hot air balloon only to have his fall broken by the Danial Kleinman's outrageously 90's opening credit sequence.

Don't get any ideas Mad Men!
Before we move on, I would be remiss if I didn't mention that the credits are set to one of the two or three best songs in the Bond cannon. The titular track by Garbage is a fantastic at subtly pointing out all of the shallow, soul eating ambition that it takes to be a Bond villain: "The world is not enough, but it's a very good place to start... If you're strong enough, together we can take tear this world apart." The irony is that the title inspiring that song isn't what the villain says before launching an atomic bomb but rather, the Bond family motto.

Anyway, Bond emerges from the credits mostly unharmed (he has a broken arm, sorta), and we start to learn about the convoluted plot involving former kidnapping victim/recent orphan/oil heiress Electra King (Sophie Marceau), the pipeline she's building and Renard (Robert Carlyle), the pain immune terrorist Bond must protect her from. After a brief visit with Q (Desmond Llewellyn in his final performance) to pick up some gadgets (X-Ray glasses, BMW, and a jacket that transforms into a dome for some reason) Bond jets off to Azerbaijan.

Normally Bond would try and seduce King immediately but this time he waits a whole ten minutes out of respect for her dead father or something nonsense. So while we wait we get predictable character development punctuated by a scene where the pair are attacked by flying snowmobiles (not as cool as it sounds). Bond later abandons his role as bodyguard so he can stumble around and find that aforementioned nuclear facility.

It's here that he meets the film's other Bond girl, Christmas Jones (Denise Richards), who lives up to her reputation as one of the worst recent Bond girls. It's not that Richards is miscast as a nuclear physicist (she is), it's that the film is incapable of making us believe that she's a professional of any sort. I'm sorry, but nuclear physicists, even the sexy ones, don't wear crop tops and booty shorts to work. It doesn't help that "nuclear physicist" is her only discernible attribute so there's no reason to care about her even a little bit even though she's the one Bond ends up with at the end. She's also completely useless for most of the film, making her the only damsel in distress in Brosnon's entire run. Furthermore, Jones's underwritten and lacking role is only underlined by all of the character development that Electra gets.

Electra, in the meantime is one of the more interesting Bond girls in a while. Late into the film we discover that the aloof, independent King is (Spoiler Alert) the secret evil mastermind, and a good one at that. She kidnaps Bonds boss, M (Judi Dench), and plans on nuking Istanbul so she can have oil pipeline supremacy. The film ends with Bond facing the choice of killing a woman he cares about to protect the world. In a better film, this might be an important turning point in the franchises mythology, making her the most important woman in the Bond cannon since his wife Tracy, but it's not a better film. Just once I'd like Bond to have some baggage that meant anything. (/End Spoilers)

The main issue though is the action. On the one hand we have some fairly authentic feeling Geo-political scrambling, but then we have action scenes that are ridiculous and cartoony even for a Bond film. In addition to the boat sequence and the flying snowmobile scene we also have a sequence where Bond and co. are attacked by helicopters carrying two-story buzzsaws to cut the building he's in in half. The latter is so big and grandiose, you assume it's the climactic ending, but it's not, not by a long shot. These increasingly silly action scenes are a dangerous president. This film goes too far with them and our next film in the marathon will go so outrageously far with them that it'll cause a massive shift in the series.

This film was directed by Micheal Apted, who may be the most interesting director to ever be allowed a crack at the series. He's done such diverse films as Coal Miner's Daughter and Gorillas in the Mist, but he's arguably most known for the Up documentaries, which has been slowly documenting the lives of the same group of Londoners from childhood through retirement and beyond. They are among the most remarkable experiences cinema has to offer. It's unfair to criticize a Bond film on that level, but you should see those instead.

Grade: C-

Did you know you can now follow this blog on Facebook? Well, now you do.

Enjoy these other Bondathon entries:
You Only Live Twice
On Her Majesty's Secret Service 
Diamonds Are Forever
Live and Let Die
The Man With The Golden Gun 
The Spy Who Loved Me 
Moonraker
For Your Eyes Only
Octopussy  
A View To A Kill
The Living Daylights
Licence To Kill
Goldeneye
Tomorrow Never Dies
The World is Not Enough
Die Another Day
Casino Royale
Quantum of Solace
Skyfall

 

Saturday, October 20, 2012

BONDATHON: TOMORROW NEVER DIES


I often wonder about the minions in the Bond universe. I don't mean the 2nd tier muscle men that Bond often deals with, but the low level employees. Do the thousands of technicians working on those plots know why their boss wants to build a super-laser in a hollowed out volcano? Do they know he's evil? Do super-villains ever worry about their plans leaking?

The answer, according to Tomorrow Never Dies, is that everyone is indeed in on it, to some degree at least. It's villain, Eliot Carver (Johnathan Pryce) is a media mogul who want's to start a war between Britain and China by basically reenacting the Gulf of Tonkin incident but with different countries. Carver makes no bones about his evilness to his employees (as if the platinum crew cut wasn't a hint). Early in the film he holds a meeting with all his news editors where they manipulate and plant news stories to boost profits, with much evil cackling and hand ringing. Later, before he kills a very prominent socialite he has a lowly news anchor record the obituary in advance just so he can show it to his victim first. There's evil, and there's plain carelessness. I half expected Carver's janitor to be in on the evilness. It doesn't help that Pryce and director Robert Spottiswoode (Stop or My Mon Will Shoot!) insist that Carver be played as over the top as possible. Dr. Evil in the Austin Powers films is more down to earth than this guy.

With the evil scheme pretty well spelled out to us in the beginning, watching Bond (Pierce Brosnan) try and uncover it is pretty dull. The film tries to spice it up by revealing that Carvers wife Paris (Teri Hatcher), is Bonds former lover.  Upon learning this M (Judi Dench) orders 007 to "pump her for information."

Dropping in on a former Bond girl is kinda a neat idea. It offers an opportunity to show us a new side of the character and follow up on the post-modern aspirations of Goldeneye. Unfortunately the script (which was rushed into production to satisfy a studio stock-holder) isn't really interested in this idea and all we get is some sub-par banter before Paris is killed just to give Bond some cheep revenge motivation that is never mentioned again.

The second half of the film is better. Bond goes to China and teams up with local agent Wai Lin, played by Michelle Yeoh (Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon) to stop Carver. The idea of Bond teaming up with a foreign, female version of himself isn't new. We got a similar version of the character in The Spy Who Loved Me. But this version can act and do all of her own stunts.

Those stunts are pretty spectacular at times. The best scene in the movie, the scene that makes up for all the dullness that came before, is a bravado stunt sequence where Bond and Lin are handcuffed together and slide down a building, get onto a motorcycle (they share the handle bars) and evade a helicopter that's using it's blades to mow down civilians. Credit for this bravado sequence goes to second unit director/legendary stunt man Vic Armstrong.

I liked the gadgets in this film. The best is Bond's BMW which can be controlled from his cell phone. This may have come off as too over the top in 1997, but in 2012 I'm surprised there isn't an app for that. But then again, in 2012, wikileaks would stop Carver long before Bond could.

In addition to the stunts and the gadgets there are a few nice performances. Vincent Schiaveli scores laughs as Dr. Kaufman, an assassin who dabbles in torture and specializes in celebrity overdoses. Bronson continues to be a great Bond, playing the character as a fun loving child rather than a sadist (Connery/Dalton) or a square (Moore). If the earlier Bonds felt like imperial relics keeping the world in check, Brosnan's Bond just wants to party. In Goldeneye, that glee served a clear thematic purpose, in Tomorrow Never Dies it just serves to cover up plot holes and an underwritten script. It's still fun, but the film is a huge step backwards.

Grade: C+

Enjoy these other Bondathon entries:
You Only Live Twice
On Her Majesty's Secret Service 
Diamonds Are Forever
Live and Let Die
The Man With The Golden Gun 
The Spy Who Loved Me 
Moonraker
For Your Eyes Only
Octopussy  
A View To A Kill
The Living Daylights
Licence To Kill
Goldeneye
Tomorrow Never Dies
The World is Not Enough
Die Another Day
Casino Royale
Quantum of Solace
Skyfall

Thursday, October 11, 2012

BONDATHON: LICENCE TO KILL


Timothy Dalton's second and final outing as James Bond, Licence To Kill deserves some credit, in that it strips away the vast majority of the Bond formula tropes. Unfortunately it simply trades one set of conventions for another. Instead of a Bond film, this is an 80’s cop movie with spies, Lethal Weapon 007 if you will.  

The film brings back CIA agent Felix Leiter (David Hedison). Bond’s friend and frequent partner. Felix is doing really well. He’s captured infamous drug lord Franz Sanchez (Robert Davi), and he’s getting married. There's a big party, dancing, presents. Felix is on top of the world.  It’d be a real shame if Sanchez where to escape, kill Leiter’s wife and feed him to a shark. Bond wouldn't like that. Why, he would swear revenge and go on an all out killing spree.

The cop cliché’s pile up as Bond meets an informant (Carey Lowell) in a strip club (the kind where the girls keep dancing through bar fights). Bond is shocked to discover that his contact is a woman. She scoffs at Bonds assertions that a woman can’t be a cop and makes fun of his Walter PPK. Of course, the cop movie transformation wouldn't be complete without a scene where Bond goes rogue after M (Robert Brown) essentially orders Bond to hand over his gun and his badge. "You're a loose cannon Bond!"

Licence want's you to think that it's darkest, grittiest film in the franchise. But quite frankly it's just as ridiculous as always. The only thing keeping it from the camp of the Roger Moore days is the relentless violence. Apart from the hot cheese of the 80's cop cliche's we have scenes where someone tries to stab Bond with a swordfish, a mack truck that does wheelies while Schwarzeneggerean explosions go off in the distance, and we haven't even gotten to the gadgets.


I half expected that truck to roar
After Bond quits/is fired from the service,  Q (Desmond Llewelyn) takes it upon himself to provide Bond with some gadgets that might help him out. They are not his best, the worst is a Polaroid camera that takes X-rays AND shoots lasers at the same time for some reason. I kept waiting to see how Bond would use this insane, ill-conceived gadget during the climax, but sadly he never does.

The idea of Bond going rogue could be an interesting idea. Taking away all of 007's tactical support, and forcing him to fend for himself could be dramatically fascinating. But the thing is that Bond is never on his own in this film. He has Q giving the same tactical support he always has.  Consequently I still don't believe that Bond can survive on wits. Sure he applies some Yojimbo like manipulations to Sanchez and his men, but none them are believable. The film asks us to buy that Sanchez doesn't know Bond is his enemy when Bond was there doing most of the work when he was apprehended in the first place.  Even if Sanchez never saw Bond (which is a stretch), it's firmly established that Sanchez has moles in Leiter unit who probably saw the whole thing.

The use of Felix Leiter in this film is a bit odd. Ostensibly his inclusion is a way to trade on the mythology of the series, but it can't get that right either. Hedison's casting makes little sense, he played Leiter once before way back in 1973's Live And Let Die where he was as forgettable as most of the actors playing Leiter. If you're trying to build a consistent universe and build the world, why not bring back John Terry who played the role briefly in the last film?

This is a film of lasts in the Bond franchise. Firstly it was the last film for screenwriter Richard Maibaum who wrote or co-wrote the lions share franchise. Secondly it was the last film for title designer Maurice Binder who had grown too ill to continue.  Most importantly, this is the last film for Timothy Dalton as Bond. Dalton was scheduled to do a third film but between the low performance of Licence, rights issues with the franchise and the end of the Cold War, it was decided to replace Bond yet again with the next film.

But Dalton would be fine. He’s that rare anomaly, the only actor who’s arguably more known for his post-Bond roles. People of my generation are likely to recognize Dalton for Hot Fuzz, Rocketeer, Toy Story 3, Flash Gordon, Doctor Who, Chuck, and having an awesome British voice long before James Bond. Still, he was a excellent Bond, who's darker energy would eventually provide an important template for the current incarnation. But that said, as dark as these films are, with all the murder and bloodshed, the last image we get in a Dalton Bond is of a giant stone fish winking at the audience.

Grade: C


Enjoy these other Bondathon entries:
You Only Live Twice
On Her Majesty's Secret Service 
Diamonds Are Forever
Live and Let Die
The Man With The Golden Gun 
The Spy Who Loved Me 
Moonraker
For Your Eyes Only
Octopussy  
A View To A Kill
The Living Daylights
Licence To Kill
Goldeneye
Tomorrow Never Dies
The World is Not Enough
Die Another Day
Casino Royale
Quantum of Solace
Skyfall

 

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

LOOPER

It’s 2044. Joe (Joseph Gorden-Levitt) is standing in a cornfield, looking at a pocket watch with nonsensical symbols. At the appointed time a second man appears out of thin air with a bag over his head. Joe shoots the man dead and burns his body. Joe does this sort of thing all the time. He is a looper, a specialized assassin who kills people sent back from 30 years in the future, where time travel exists and is controlled by the mob.

His life is glamorous. The money is good, there are fast cars, women and drugs. This is fortunate for Joe as it seems that 2044 has suffered an economic apocalypse. One day, Joe gets a looping assignment but the man who appears is himself from 30 years in the future (Bruce Willis). This happens sometimes, it’s known as “closing the loop.”  Upon being confronted with his future self, he hesitates just long enough to let old Joe get away and the chase is on. In another movie, Joe would wrestle with the idea of having to kill his future self, but Joe knows what happens to people who fail to close their loops. 

To reveal anything more would be unfair. Also it would take too much time. There is a lot going on in this movie. Writer-director Rian Johnson (Brick, Brothers Bloom) has created one of the most intricate sci-fi universes to come along in a long time. There's something interesting going on around every corner. It’s also admirable that he has the confidence to not explain too much. Much like Star Wars or Blade Runner, a lot of the details and ideas are left for the audience to pick up on and fill in for themselves. Personally, I was fascinated by this idea of this future society using the past as something to exploit, as a dumping ground for its problems. It was as if 2044 was the subjugated colony of 2074. The future mobsters (I love saying that), even send a viceroy named Abe (Jeff Daniels in a hilarious performance) back in time to run the looper operation and keep them in line.

Another admirable thing about this film is its willingness to let its protagonist be an asshole. Both versions of Joe do reprehensible things to survive in this film, which is fine when it's justified, but though old Joe is given a pretty reasonable out, he would rather continue on a very violent path for the most selfish of reasons. It’s fun watching a film where your allegiance to the protagonist and antagonist switches back and forth, and even more fun knowing that they’re really the same person.

Both stars do wonderful jobs in their respective roles. Between this and Moonrise Kingdom, Willis seems to be on a bit of a roll. Levitt wears some light prosthetics to make him look more like a young Bruce Willis. From the side the resemblance is uncanny, but from the front it seems like he used too much filler on his eyebrows. Who knows, maybe that’s just how the kids wear their eyebrows in 2044. Anyway Levitt is excellent, he’s picked up a lot of Willis’s mannerisms, the sarcastic apathy, the lack of eye contact with authority figures, Levitt’s got the Bruce Willis thing down.

Ever since Rian Johnson broke out with his 2005 noir masterpiece Brick, he's been positioning himself as one of our most important young writer-directors. That he chose to do a sci-fi action thriller is commendable. His intricate world building and stylization suits the genre quite well, I hope he does more stuff like this. Lord knows the genre needs more auteurs as talented like Johnson.

Grade:A-

Saturday, October 6, 2012

BONDATHON: THE LIVING DAYLIGHTS

The idea of the reboot is fairly new. The concept of starting a franchise over to correct irrevocable harm done by a previous incarnation, gained a lot of prominence in the 2000's. Usually there is an all new cast, and an origin story to returns to the "edgy roots" of the franchise. In 1987, The Living Daylights became a rough template for this modern idea. This film is not the origin story it was initially conceived as, but it does shake up the cast somewhat with a new Bond (Timothy Dalton) and a new Moneypenney (Caroline Bliss) and most importantly, it captures the tone of the Ian Fleming stories better than any of the other Bonds until 2006's Casino Royale.

What's impressive about the film is it's momentum. Other Bonds have struggled integrating story and action, usually having to chose between one or the other. Living Daylights manages to have lots of action and 3 times as much story as the average Bond adventure. We meet our new Bond, as he foils Soviet assassins that have invaded a mock combat exercise. Then, before we've had a chance to recover, he's off to Czechoslovakia to help extract a KGB defector who has knowledge about a new program to kill foreign spies. But something about the whole thing seems fishy to Bond, he's dealt with the Russian general who's supposedly behind it all and he doesn't seem the type for unprovoked attacks. There's also the matter of the female cellist/sniper Bond foiled back in Czechoslovakia and the arms dealer (Joe Don Baker) and the Afghan opium ring.

The film is a bit of a coming out party for director John Glen, who directed all of the late period Moore films. But his down to earth style never fully jived with the whimsy of the Moore-era, but it does fit with Dalton. Dalton plays the role with an intensity and tenacity that are more reminiscent of Fleming's Bond than Connery's or Moore's. He's a killer and he enjoys being a killer. Very few things are as satisfying in cinema as people who enjoy being good at their jobs. Credit should also go to veteran Bond scribes Richard Maibaum and Michael Wilson for actually creating a script where Bond is genuinely interested in the mystery and does proper espionage instead of bumbling about until he gets captured by the bad guy. 

The strong script keeps the films many action scenes from feeling gratuitous. The scenes are well done even if they still depend more on gimcrackery than craftsmanship. Oh, it's been a while but we also get our first real Bond gadget car since Spy Who Loved Me. I'm really surprised how rarely the series gives 007 a gadget car seeing how I grew up in the Brosnon-era where they were as obligatory as the shaken martini's. This one is an Aston Martin Vantage and it resembles the 90's Bond cars quite well, it's bullet proof, naturally, and has heat-seeking missiles, snow skids and a rocket engine. Or as Bond calls them: "extras."

While we're on the subject of formula elements, lets talk about music. After the success of the Duran Duran single for the previous film, it was decided that this film would have not one but three original songs. The title track is by a-ha (I've never heard of them either) and the other two are by The Pretenders. All of them are pretty terrible as is the score by John Barry (his last for the series). The 80's school of pop just feels so out of place in this darker, more serious Bond. At the very least it dates the film badly.

Despite some bad music, this is one of the better entries of the Bond franchise. The strong script and the darker tone is a welcome break after 7 Moore films. Dalton is a fantastic Bond and it's a pity he'll only get to do one more film.

Grade: B+

The Living Daylights is currently streaming on Netflix Instant.



Enjoy these other Bondathon entries:
You Only Live Twice
On Her Majesty's Secret Service 
Diamonds Are Forever
Live and Let Die
The Man With The Golden Gun 
The Spy Who Loved Me 
Moonraker
For Your Eyes Only
Octopussy  
A View To A Kill
The Living Daylights
Licence To Kill
Goldeneye
Tomorrow Never Dies
The World is Not Enough
Die Another Day
Casino Royale
Quantum of Solace
Skyfall