There’s a lot of hype and trepidation about The Dark Knight Rises as to whether or
not it will conclude the trilogy with a bang or a whimper. If he does, Nolan
will be the first director in 50 years to create a trilogy that tops itself with
each entry. Such a feat is akin to a world heavyweight championship of film, to
the winner goes the trilogy belt (explained more fully in part one
of this series).
You can know follow this blog on Facebook by clicking this link
Nolan has more than history working against
him, he also has the 2nd installment of his trilogy, The Dark Knight,which whatever its flaws is certainly one of the
most unique and relentlessly entertaining blockbusters of late.
It’s been a year since Bruce Wayne (Christian
Bale) took up the mantle of Batman and hit the streets of Gotham to start a war
on crime. In his crusade he has joined forces with Lieutenant Gordon (Gary
Oldman) and the newly elected DA Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckheart) who's currently
dating Bruce's love interest Rachel (now played by Maggie Gyllenhaal). Batman
and co. have had some solid results. Together they’ve managed to deprive the
Gotham mob of its accountant and along with him go all their finances, but
there’s a new complication in the form of the Joker (Heath Leger), a punk rock,
psychotic super crook bent on nothing less than the obliteration of Gotham’s
soul.
Complication is the key word of Dark Knight. The film is a relentless
series of horrors. The highly episodic plot never slows down. A great villain
exists to put the hero through the ringer, Nolan understands this and treats
the film like a Shock & Awe campaign, never letting the audience get
comfortable. Many films use a sort of ticking time-bomb to accelerate the 3rd
act. This film seems to have them every five minutes. Joker issues an ultimatum
that people will die every day Batman doesn’t reveal his identity. Later, two
main characters are kidnaped and Batman must choose who to save. Joker orders
the city to kill a man in an hour or he blows up a hospital, etc. This tactic
makes the film a wonderfully nerve racking experience. Every time you think
Joker has run out of evil schemes, he pulls something even more diabolical out
of his hat. The fact that the film doesn't collapse by the end or run out of
juice is a huge testament to how well much of this film works.
What doesn’t always work is the drama. Dark Knight is ultimately supposed to be
a tragic film about men who pin all their hopes on an all too human savior.
This is all very thoroughly explained to us in the films worst scene where
Bruce, Rachel and Dent sit around a table an talk to the audience about the
films themes. It’s a shame that a film with such an ingenious structure has to
resort to such condescending exposition. Also the tragic parts are
underwritten. Perhaps I’m too familiar with the comics to be surprised about
what happens to Harvey Dent, but I still should have felt something. It’s as if
the characters invest more in Dent than the film is able to. It’s not as if the
film doesn’t have time, Dent is on screen long enough, but that thread only
works on an intellectual level and not necessarily an emotional one.
Nolan’s technical skills took a measurable
step up with this film. He starts to play with sound in interesting ways. Being
an action film, there are naturally a lot of loud bangs, but Nolan contrasts
this by dialing back at times to the point that there are snippets of complete
silence that really force us to look more fully at the image. Those images are
better than ever, he and his cinematographer Wally Pfister have sharpened their
visuals a lot for this film. The last film made a huge jump towards
"realism" but still had a foot in the overly designed world of the
old Batman films (the trains, the
backlots). Dark Knight makes more
extensive use of location shooting (mostly using Chicago as Gotham) and it
really works like gangbusters.
Nolan’s ability to conceive and shoot action sequences has
improved measurably. There are some memorable show stoppers here. The opening
bank heist and the extraction of the mob accountant from Hong Kong are
particular standouts. But while Nolan’s ability to edit these scenes aren’t
always up to snuff (this video
goes into excruciating detail as to why), they’re still extremely effective on
a visceral level. The fist fights are better photographed this time out. The
camera has been pulled back and you can actually see Batman hitting people this
time. That said, there are still some clunkers. Late in the film there’s a
gimmick involving sonar vision. Now there are some gadgets in these films that
are totally plausible (sky hook), and some stuff that it’s better not to think
to hard about. Of the later group, Batman’s sonar vision strains credibility
the most. Worst of all it’s an ugly, disorienting gimmick that really detracts
from the enjoyment of the film.
This whole scene is a headache. |
Now whereas Batman Begins was an example of the superhero formula done about as
well as it can be done (despite some flaws). The Dark Knight is all about changing perceptions of the genre. Dark Knight has very little to do with
the standard superhero movie. It’s much more like a crime film that happens to
have a superhero in it. It’s clear that it’s not Iron Man but film’s like Micheal Mann’s Heat that are the film’s closest cousin. Now in comparison to Heat it doesn’t quite measure up, but
it’s a relatively fair fight most of the time.
One of the things evening out the playing
field is Heath Leger as Joker. It's been 4 years since Dark Knight came out so
there's nothing really left to say about the performance other than wowie wow
wow! It's a very twitchy performance but his intense, calculating gaze keeps
him down to earth. Also it's just an interesting character, he isn't evil just
for the sake of it, he's an armchair shrink out to prove his theories of human
existence and shake up the established order. Most of all he wants to expose
Batman as a fraud. The thing is, Joker is kinda right. As the film goes on,
Batman seems more and more willing to cross lines to stop Joker. Like Dirty
Harry, he tortures suspects, breaks legs, even wire-taps the entire city and
barely stops for a second to consider it. Like in the last film, he also has to
decide if he's going to go all the way and become a murderer. (Spoilers for that 1 person who still hasn't seen this
movie) First, he throws Joker off the side of a building but saves him.
This is an improvement over his behavior in the first film where he left Ra's
Al Ghul to an almost certain death. Perhaps he felt that he would have been
more directly responsible for Jokers death seeing that it was him who
personally threw him. Or perhaps Nolan didn't want to reenact the
ending of Burton's '89 film too closely. Later, after the Joker has been apprehended,
Batman learns that Dent has gone insane and has kidnapped Gordon's family. In
that scene Batman finally, explicitly, directly kills someone. We can argue
that it was justified, but again, the point is that Batman breaks his most
important rule and he'll have more trouble rationalizing it this time, and even
though Batman finds a way to salvage some dignity, it's very clear that Joker
has essentially won. Batman gets torn down, he breaks his rules, loses his
objectivity and discipline and even worse his legacy as a force for good is
ruined. Batman finds a way to salvage a win, but it feels like a hollow one. (end spoilers)
The dramatic elements of Dark Knight are sometimes hit and miss, but Nolan still manages to
tell an amazingly entertaining yarn. Like Begins, it feels a little
essayish at times but is emencely entertaining with some interesting moral
quandaries. It's a superior sequel that elevates the genre. 2008 was an
important year for the comic book movies, Dark Knight and Hellboy II ushered
the super-hero genre into more ambitious, more adult territory. It's a shame
that the rest of the industry hasn't followed suit.
Grade: A-
Entries in this series:
The Dark Knight
You can know follow this blog on Facebook by clicking this link
You are right about the Declaration of Harvey Dent as the soul of Gotham. It's repetitive and sounds nothing like "Comic Gordon and Batman".
ReplyDelete